elemental change

Heaven or Las Vegas – Part II

So, back to Sin City. I promise this is the last posting with this particular geographic focus.

Buildings in Vegas

Another thing that always strikes me in Las Vegas is how much effort has been put into the grand architecture and how unmoving it all actually is. Sometimes I imagine it is because much of them are fake reproductions other things – and of course – no one likes a fake – even if it is kind of nice. The Italian semiologist and author Umberto Eco (In the Name of the Rose) had a lot to say on these created realities in his classic Travels in Hyperreality. I won’t get that deep here. Rather, let me just drag out a couple more of my horrible picture phone shots of the Fake Eiffel Tower and the Belagio Fountain thing (to be fair the Belagio Fountain thing actually IS kind of cool…). I took these a couple of weeks ago.

This is a fake Eiffel Tower (Tour Eiffel for you Franco-phone types) Hotel Belagio Fountain Show Thing

Form and Spirit

I think the uninspiring nature of these edifices also has something to do with the concept of form and spirit. Generally form and spirit need to come together for something to be spectacular – these qualities are inextricably linked. When one stands before Niagra Falls – there is something that moves you – the form is breathtaking white water – the spirit is the sheer power of the natural world. The real Eiffel Tower, for example, is animated by it’s history as a World Exposition project and a tribute to the French Revolution. Fake Eiffel Tower is a casino. More on that later.

Religion and Architecture

Detail of Cologne Cathedral

I have always been sort of into the architecture of Catholic Churches around the world. When I was about 10 years old I was lucky enough to travel throughout Italy with my family- and always stood in wonder that people could conceive of and build these awesome structures – esp given the construction technology of the time. This interest started in Venice and took me through Rome and Naples etc. Once I grew older I took side trips in places like Romania, Prague, France and Germany to check out churches at every chance. The famous Gothic Church in Milan and the Cologne Cathedral of Germany are amongst the most astounding things I’ve ever seen.

The Catholic Church does not corner the market on remarkable architecture inspired by religion. The Taj Mahal, the Pryamids, Machu Pichu, Dome of the Rock – pretty much any amazing old structure one can think of was most likely inspired by religion. There is a reason for this.

Aesthetics and Change

The architects of these sacred spaces understood their ability to move people and to effect change in them. When one enters a really large church with religious symbols and semiotic messages all around – you cannot help but feel small – and that there is a greater power at work in the world. The ability of churches to move people is just one example of the power of aesthetics. Music, art, film – these all hold in their posession the ability to affect change in us. For example if you watch the Last King of Scotland and Hotel Rwanda in a sitting – your perception of Africa will be forever changed. You might be moved to travel there. You might be moved to start a charity for refugees. Something will change in your mind and possibly in your actions.

Aeshetics and Inspiration

I think the change they are going for in the large churches, mosques and temples is inspirational/transformative change. Deepening of Faith. Willingness to give yourself over to something larger. Etc. And I am sure it generally worked. Another classic example of this sort of motivation are the military bands that used to accompany soldiers into battle. How else do you get otherwise smart folks to march to their demise – inspire them along the way. I actually never got this concept until I started working out to Rage Against the Machine and Paul Van Dyk and my workouts became much more intense. Beats loungey house hands down.

Heaven or Las Vegas?

The casino owners/developers in Las Vegas understand the change aesthetics can create just as well as the builders of the great Gothic churches of the 1400s. The buildings are a siren calling you to part with your money for $9 vodkas and $1,000 bets. Put people in lavish surroundings and they might even start to feel wealthy. Why not double down one more time ? Make people feel rich and they will act like it (i.e. spend at will). That is the secret to the Wynn and all the rest.

And it seems to be working. I was astounded to see Wynn following up his triumph of a couple of years ago with a new hotel called Encore – it’s almost complete. These buildings don’t build themselves – somewhere in here is a powerful business model. And a good part of it is aesthetics – something Vegas does well.

But when I stand back from the buildings – I’m still not excited, and something feels fishy – they don’t move me. That’s probably a good thing because if they did – I’d most likely be doubling down…

I hope that one of the brothers here will take up this theme in some new direction – as there much more to explore and this post has gone on long enough. Maybe in the area of music?

April 22, 2008 Posted by sean.g | Aesthetics, Design, Religion | , , | No Comments Yet

Humpty Dumpty sat on the wall …

This is a follow-on from the idea about the Forces of Light and Darkness, and I have to give major credit to my friend Mace Rosen for this insight … thank you Mace for your random thoughts …

Basically, when you make a list of “constructive forces” in society and “destructive forces”, it is quite astonishing to see that maybe 90% or even more of the time, constructive forces tend to take a long, long time to do their work, while destructive forces often operate in a much shorter timeframe.  One sobering thought along these lines is that it takes 20 years of endless effort to raise a child to adulthood, and an unfortunate bullet fired in a fraction of a second to end those 20 years of work.  You can think of many more analogies, including our dear friend Humpty Dumpty cheerfully sitting on the wall above.

So this is perhaps another reason why, in relation to the question Sholeh posed, it can be hard to remain optimistic in times when a lot of forces are operating in both directions, because it seems you have the law of time working against you when you try to align with the forces of progress.  With Humpty falling off the wall so often, and all the kings horses and all the kings men so stressed out trying to put his poor IKEA made parts back together again, its hard to maintain that cheerful Humpty smile.   Unless Humpty was hard-boiled, maybe that is the secret.

 

April 20, 2008 Posted by shastrip | Uncategorized | | 2 Comments

Neanderthal man speaks after 30,000 years

If you ever wondered if the human race has made progress in 30,000 years or not, try listening to the sound of Neanderthal man that has just been reconstructed:

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/04/16/neanderthal.sound/index.html

Its interesting what a factor “speech” and “language” plays in social progress.  It fascinates me that the scriptures of the Bahai Faith mention three specific “signs” for the maturity of the human race, and one of these is that all the people in the world will be able to communicate with each other using the same language (that is everyone would still learn their “mother tongue”, but we would also learn a language that was common to everyone on the planet — either one of the existing languages to be agreed upon, or a new one).  I saw an entire country change by applying this principle — I grew up in Singapore which, a few decades ago, had different races of people speaking 4 different languages.  The government then introduced into all the school systems a policy of teaching children English as a common language for everyone in the country, as well as mandatory education in another of the 3 languages spoken (usually the “mother tongue” of the child).  Anyway, no need to comment on the progress Singapore has made in the past few decades :)   I’m sure being able to understand each other was one among many factors but surely an important one.

Now we can only hope that whatever common language the whole human race  may eventually adopt is not as frog sounding as the Neanderthals :)

April 17, 2008 Posted by shastrip | Global issues, Science | , , | 1 Comment

Heaven or Las Vegas – Part I

While this blog was getting up and running I was in Las Vegas for a week long tech industry event. It made me want to post something Vegas related – as sordid as that sounds. After being in that town for a week I decided that 2 days (when someone else is paying) can be fun, 3 days is too many, and 5 days is intolerable. I digress.

The Jubilee

Of the many outrageous signs and displays I witnessed – one struck me as particularly hilarious. A friend of mine uses the the word Jubilee often when referring to celebretory events. He is riffing on the traditional Biblical definition of the Jubilee which is defined here:

The concept of the Jubilee is a special year of remission of sins and universal pardon. In the Biblical book of Leviticus, a Jubilee year is mentioned to occur every fifty years, in which slaves and prisoners would be freed, debts would be forgiven and the mercies of God would be particularly manifest.

The traditional notion of Jubilee illustrated

In humorous contrast, the sign for Jubilee in Las Vegas displays the word juxtaposed with a picture of a woman’s backside. My camera phone does this image no justice – but use your imagination – it’s probably better that it’s blurry:

Vegas Jubilee!?

The description of this spectacle is as follows:

The showgirl is synonymous with Las Vegas and there’s no show in town that glorifies showgirls quite like Jubilee! at Bally’s. It’s obvious from the opening song about “Hundreds of Girls” that this show is going to be all about the statuesque, sequined beauties. While there aren’t quite hundreds of girls in the show, there are about 85 performers — both topless and covered.

Why are you talking about showgirls in Vegas?

The contrast between these two reminded me of a fairly profound concept that was conveyed to me in a class on spiritual philosophy. It starts with the premise that we are spiritual beings – seeking to obtain spiritual attributes or qualities through a material experience. Whether we are aware or not – our soul seeks this growth – and it is the inherit nature of our soul to do so. Sort of like the absolute nature of fire is to burn – it has no choice.

At the same time – all spiritual qualities or elements have their equal and opposite representation in the material world. Sometimes we become confused – and seek these spiritual attributes through their material counterpart. A pithy example would be to seek the spiritual quality of love through promiscuity. Or to seek communion and meditative state though mind altering elements rather than prayer and meditation. The rub of the situation is our soul will seek this growth – whether we are mindful of it or not – so if we are unaware of our own inherit nature for some kind of growth - we will often screw up and seek the wrong experiences.

And Change?

The Jubilee in Vegas sort of reminds me of a bizarro Christian Jubilee. One is the celebration of sin – the other is about God’s forgiveness and pardon for sin. How does this relate to the concept of change which is at the heart of this ongoing discussion? It seems that if one is seeking to alter the most basic building block of change – the human heart – it would be helpful to look into our own lives to discover where our soul is seeking growth in the wrong place. Are we sifting through dust as a shortcut? The way we orient ourselves – spiritual or material – can effect the way we interact with the world around us. And as we interact with the world – we change it. True and lasting change can never be mandated, managed, ordered or administered. It is difficult and messy because it happens slowly – one soul at a time.

April 15, 2008 Posted by sean.g | Purpose, Religion | , , | 4 Comments

Religious Music

Dawnbreaker Collective Sufjan Stevens
The phrase religious music conjures images of clouds-with-rainbows album covers and reverb-drenched synthesizer pads. Well, at least with me it does. Because of this I’ve often shied away from it, preferring instead the less-overt spiritualism contained in the likes of U2. Sufjan Stevens represents a new type of spirituality in music, one that has at its core an authenticity consistent with the times. What’s sad is that it appears that the commercial viability of authenticity in this arena may have a commercial cost; that’s the perception anyway:

“So Stevens apparently believes the ”Christian artist“ stamp is a deal breaker. Likewise his publicist, who reminded me that ”Sufjan has asked that the topic of religion not be discussed in interviews from this point on.“ (Hmm. Does Kanye West feel the same?) But beyond railing at his own reception, Stevens, a trained oboist, also bemoans the decline of popular music and struggles to mediate the gap he sees between high art and folk.”
- Sylvester, Nick. “Without a Prayer”, The Village Voice, August 8, 2005.

All this pessimism about the state of music that reflects ones spiritual life hasn’t stopped the Dawnbreaker Collective from putting together an eclectic but coherent album which speaks to youth in a musical language they can understand (Arise, 2007). Rather than water the Bahá’í Faith’s message of the promise of world unity, the album brings it to the forefront, combining it top-rate production values that make the message that much more acceptable to those who recognize the modern sounds.

It reminds me of the time I met President Bill Clinton when he visited East Palo Alto. I was standing next to Jamal (last name forgotten) who was sharing the office next to College Track’s. As President Clinton made his way around the room, shaking every hand and introducing himself (“Hi, yes I know, Bill. Nice to meet you.”) he came to Jamal. because of my proximity to the Jamal-Bill meeting I was able to notice that the President gave Jamal what can only be described as a dap shake. You know the one, it starts with a regular handshake and goes through two additional transitions ending in the greeter’s fingers locked at the second metacarpals (how’s that for making something hip less so through description?). The president followed it with: “Hey man, I’m Bill.” Bill Clinton was modifying his delivery based on the recipient, in this case a young adult African American with shoulder-length dreadlocks. This might be interpreted by some as patronizing but on the contrary I believe it showed great cultural sensitivity.

This is all pretty close to home for me as a musician and one who cares deeply about the intersection of faith and the arts. My own explorations have yielded the following rough song which I present for the first time here publicly. Please feel free to use it for your own children’s classes if you find it useful. I offer it under creative Commons licensing. Creative Commons License

We Are Drops 2008, Pedraum, Luc and Sophie Pardehpoosh

Are there other artists you know of that have infused their music with spiritual themes without preaching? Do you have a favorite album that has clouds and rainbows on the cover and I’ve offended you with that earlier comment? Tell me so in the comments.

Concerning The UFO Sighting Near Highland, Illinois from the album “Illinoise” by Sufjan Stevens

April 11, 2008 Posted by trukadero | Music, Religion | , , | 4 Comments

The link between belief and behavior (Case Study: global warming)

CO2 is the exhaling breath of the global economy. Changing this will require an unprecedented and united global effort. Which, in turn, will require a higher level of global consciousness. This is the inevitable direction we’re heading, and we should be privileged that our generation has the opportunity to achieve it.

That’s my best summary of the message in Al Gore’s new slideshow. The question of how belief and behavior are linked is a central one for this blog, and we’ll have more to stay on it, and look forward to your comments, in the coming posts. For now, here’s Al:

So how do we go about achieving a new level of global consciousness? In Gore’s 1992 book, he points out various philosophies and Faith movements that could inspire us in this direction, including the Baha’i Faith:

One of the newest of the great universalist religions, Baha’i, founded in 1863 in Persia by Mirza Husayn Ali, warns us not only to properly regard the relationship between humankind and nature but also the one between civilization and the environment. Perhaps because its guiding visions were formed during the period of accelerating industrialism, Baha’i seems to dwell on the spiritual implications of the great transformation to which it bore fresh witness:

“We cannot segregate the human heart from the environment outside us and say that once one of these is reformed everything will be improved. Man is organic with the world. His inner life molds the environment and is itself deeply affected by it. The one acts upon the other and every abiding change in the life of man is the result of these mutual reactions.”

And, again, from the Baha’i sacred writings comes this:“Civilization, so often vaunted by the learned exponents of arts and sciences will, if allowed to overleap the bounds of moderation, bring great evil upon men.”

What do you see as the role of religion in addressing climate change or other global issues?

April 11, 2008 Posted by adam | Global issues, Religion, Science | | 1 Comment

Can entrepreneurs create demand?

I was reading about entrepreneurs last weekend and was struck by a simple yet powerful notion. Some entrepreneurs set out to fill demand while others aim to create demand. But what exactly is the difference?

It wasn’t the first time I had this thought, but this time I decided to ponder it. (It helped that I was sitting on the patio of a little cafe enjoying perfect weather with no schedule to speak of.)

So, I wondered, can you really create demand?

Let’s start with an easier question: who is filling demand? Well, most entrepreneurs. They see a market, usually a big and growing one, and throw their hat in the ring with the other players in the hopes of getting a piece of the pie. If they can turn a profit it’s usually because their offering is cheaper or differentiated or both. And if they build a sustainable business then they’ve figured out a way to protect their earnings with a difficult to replicate competitive advantage. There’s nothing easy about any of that, but at least the path is clear.

But what if there is no existing market for your product? Are you creating demand then?

When Cisco co-founder Len Bosack was asked how he priced his invention, the world’s first fully functional network routers, he replied simply: “we guessed.” That’s because they didn’t have any direct competitors. Cisco was the first. Things turned out well – very well in fact – for Cisco. But did they truly create demand, or was the demand already there? Didn’t companies want their networks to talk to each other? Of course they did, but they didn’t have a good way to do it before Cisco came along.

Thus, Cisco wasn’t creating demand, they were simply revealing it.

Then it hit me.

In order to create demand, you’ve got to offer something that is not only new, but also solves a problem people never knew they had. Even if you were the first to articulate the solution (as was Cisco), you can only claim to have gone so far as to reveal the latent demand.

It is only when you articulate the problem as well as the solution that you can be said to be creating demand. In the language of this blog’s central theme: you’ve got to transform people’s thoughts before you can transform their actions.

Al Gore, for example, is certainly on a mission to create demand. His slideshow is attemping to awaken people to the problem of climate change. If he succeeds, he will have helped to create demand for green products (and green policy).

But it’s certainly not just social entrepreneurs who play this game. Steve Wozniak invented the PC, but it was Steve Jobs who created the demand for it. You could argue Jobs was only revealing latent demand for productivity, but that’s splitting hairs; no one knew they needed their own personal computer before Jobs came along.

Demand creators take a risk that demand fillers (or even revealers) never do. They have to have the conviction to believe that demand will emerge once people “wake up.” They have to be thought leaders as well as innovators. Motivators as well as inventors. Mentors as well as managers. And if it is about ego (i.e., “I know what’s best”) instead of a genuine attempt to guide people to a new beneficial perspective, then they’re likely to fail.

That’s why I believe creating demand is the pinnacle of entrepreneurship. John Schaar sums it up eloquently:

The future is not the result of choices among alternative paths offered by the present, but a place that is created – created first in the mind and will, created next in activity. The future is not some place we are going to, but one we are creating. The paths are not to be found, but made, and the activity of making them changes both the maker and the destination.

April 8, 2008 Posted by adam | Entrepreneurship | | 8 Comments

Light and Darkness

“Were it not for the cold, how would the heat of Thy words prevail, O Expounder of the worlds?  Were it not for calamity, how would the sun of Thy patience shine, O Light of the worlds?

Thank you Sholeh for the thoughtful questions you raised about maintaining optimism in pessimistic times. It got me thinking about the subject of “Light and Darkness”.

It seems with all forward motion, there is always resistance, and often wherever there is light, there is shadow.

So it is natural in times when the forces of progress are at work for there to also be forces of resistance.

This is one more dimension to this “mental framework” we are trying to test and evolve through this online dialogue.

If we can see many of the depressing events that occur around us as a reaction to the forces of integration that are in fact operating in the world, it should help us to maintain optimism.

This still doesn’t mean any of this will ever be easy. I think about what it took to form the League of Nations and the United Nations — both basically a collective reaction to the two worst wars in human history. And we still haven’t come anywhere near a functioning system of reasonably united world! Gulp.

But then again, if we all collectively threw in the towel, we would still be living in caves, so something must be working somewhere to have gotten us this far, and we can only trust we will ultimately keep going in the right direction :)

 

 

 

 

April 8, 2008 Posted by shastrip | Purpose, Religion | , , | No Comments Yet

Thinking about the ultimate direction of change

“The times never remain the same, for change is a necessary quality and an essential attribute of this world, and of time and place.”

In reflecting further on the question of how we choose what “change” to consciously devote our all-too limited time and energy toward, it seems an interesting thought exercise to conduct is to step way, way outside of our average daily thinking patterns (unless we are a professional historiographer or something) and to think about the grand sweep of human history. Where is all this “change” heading? Finding the answer to this question, it seems, can help us make more intelligent choices about where we will fit in with our tiny, but nevertheless very real, contribution to the unfoldment of human history.

So where is everything headed?

Well, lets look back. Over tens of thousands of years, we have moved toward progressively larger groups of social organization and cohesion, starting with familes, moving to tribes, to villages, to city-states, and then to nations, and over the last century, varying degress of cooperation among groups of nations. One factor that has run parallel with this progression has been the steady development of technology, which has facilitated these increasing levels of social development. Where are we going then? Following this train of thought, it becomes clear that we live in an age whose primary task is to move further toward the unity of the world. Just saying it is the easy part! Of course, it will take more decades and centuries to eventually achieve (assuming the human race doesn’t destroy itself along the way, which I am confident it wont). But knowing the ultimate goal then helps in making intelligent choices toward the outcome. Is the change I am spending my time and energy on contributing toward this ultimate goal, or detracting from it? If it is detracting from it, I should ask myself, why am I trying to fight the clear flow of history?

What would be an example of each? Fighting for a cause that promotes one race as being superior to others seems like one example of going against the flow of history. Racial groups knocking each other down is a clear example of going against traffic on the one-way road to the eventual unity of the human race. What about supporting multicultural day at a child’s school? That would seem to be in line with the flow of history … however insignificant it might seem, that one small event is planting the seeds in a lot of young minds of an idea whose time has come, and will in some way shape the rest of their lives.

This is just a framework to think about. Let us know your thoughts, is this framework useful? If not, what ideas do you have of other frameworks to consider? Look forward to your comments

April 7, 2008 Posted by shastrip | Uncategorized | , , , | 1 Comment

Group Dynamics

2313296243 5D0340594A M-1 2339831206 77946C474E M
I’m lucky enough that I’ve been afforded the opportunity to attend some fascinating conferences over the last month. The TED Conference was the most expensive simulcast I’ve ever attended and the SXSW Conference was the geekiest conference intersected with the most intense music experience I’ve had in a long time. It got me thinking about group dynamics and what they are affected by. Though not scientific, here are my observations:

TED :: It’s an expensive invite-only conference that smells of exclusivity. It seems that exclusivity breeds a sort of brotherhood amongst people though I might just be cynical. It feels the same as the few times I’ve been lucky enough to get upgraded to business class on a flight. “Champagne? Oh no thank you. These seats are lovely aren’t they? Shame about Darfur isn’t it? Ooh, cashews, yes please.”
SXSW :: I was there for the Interactive Conference but because I have friends in places that matter in such things, I was afforded access to parts of the music conference that were hidden to me in years past. Without getting into too much detail look out for the MTV documentary on The Wombats to see some of the antics. This conference is a mix of creatives types at all level and locals who are lucky enough to score wristbands that get them into the music venues where the likes of R.E.M., Billy Bragg, Vampire Weekend, The Ting Tings, The Cools Kids, and Kid Sister are playing. At any given time there are over 50 bands gigging within a two-mile radius. People spill into the middle of 6th street and it’s so loud you can’t even talk to your wife while standing in the middle of it.This conference makes me think about the power of music. There’s plenty of debauchery typical of a rock n’ roll lifestyle but despite that, in my observation, there is much more calm than I would expect given the mix of mass and mescaline.

I’m interested to hear from others and their experiences with conferences attended and the dynamics. What contributes to these dynamics? Can an individual affect these dynamics?

Action Figures from the album “The Bake Sale ” by The Cool Kids

Technorati Tags: , ,

April 3, 2008 Posted by trukadero | Music | | No Comments Yet